New formulas give expression to these quantities, deepening our ability to describe the role of time in shaping the physical world by characterizing the properties of objects and phenomena as outcomes, or events. Doing so reveals several previously hidden quantities of time, such as timespeed (flow rate) and timeshift (rate of change in flow rate), which are to time what their established counterparts (i.e. This fundamentally unites the two, defining translation as their shared base, which, in turn, allows the familiar framework by which we quantify motion to be adapted for use in quantifying time to the same degree. Time is presented as the evolutional component of translation, arising in full complement to motion as the mechanical component. This paper is a short introduction to an alternative background-independent relativity principle that resolves the contradictions and takes the notions of space and time back to the realm of science. We have to face the sad truth: leading theories are belief systems, rather than scientific models, and do not have a real predictive and explanatory power. Thus, explanations are based on the dogma about an intangible entity. There is another major problem: proclaimed space-time fabric should be everywhere, but cannot be found anywhere. Thus, what they call predictions are in fact post hoc explanations. The outcome depends upon what variables are put 'by hand' to conform with observations. Whether they consider it to be fixed (Newtonian relativity) or curving (Einsteinian relativity), they depend on this background as its metrics determine the result of calculations. Current mainstream theories of physics use relativity principles that are based on the notion of space and time as some overarching framework for all things and events.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |